Cambodia vs the Philippines: 70% Cap Against 40% Cap
Everyone assumes the Philippines is the open market and Cambodia the frontier one. On ownership, tax and currency, the ranking inverts for a foreign buyer.
Quick answer: On the two exposures that decide a foreign buyer’s outcome, ownership and tax, Cambodia is the more open market. Cambodia caps foreign holding at 70% of a building’s total private-unit area against the Philippine 40% project cap, and withholds 14% on a non-resident’s rent against 25%.
The expected shape of this comparison is a mature, English-speaking, heavily regulated market against a small frontier one. That is a fair description of the two economies. It is not a description of what a foreign property buyer actually experiences in either.
Foreign buyers in both countries meet a cap, a withholding tax and a currency. Line those three up side by side and the ranking most readers arrive with turns over.
Three numbers carry most of the argument. Cambodia’s foreign cap is 70% of a building’s total private-unit area; the Philippine cap is 40% of a project. Cambodia withholds 14% on a non-resident’s Cambodian-source income; the Philippines applies a 25% final withholding tax on a non-resident alien’s gross rent with no deductions. And the Philippine peso set a record low of 61.85 to the dollar in July 2026, about 9.3% weaker year on year, while Cambodia transacts in dollars. Our analysis treats the first of those as the most consequential, because a cap does not merely restrict what you can buy, it decides who is legally permitted to buy it from you later. The three lines move in the same direction rather than offsetting one another, which is unusual in a country comparison and is the reason this page reaches a clearer verdict than the Thailand and Vietnam pages do.
What actually separates these two markets?
The Philippines is roughly six times Cambodia’s population and carries a deeper legal and financial system, while Cambodia offers a wider foreign ownership allowance at 70% and a dollar economy behind it. Foreign buyers in both countries are restricted to strata or condominium units above the ground floor, and both are locked out of land freehold entirely.
| Dimension | Cambodia | Philippines |
|---|---|---|
| Foreign ownership cap | 70% of total private-unit area | 40% of a condominium project |
| Land freehold for foreigners | Closed | Closed |
| Transaction currency | US dollar | Philippine peso |
| Non-resident rent withholding | 14% | 25% on gross |
| Capital gains tax | 20% of the gain from 1 Jan 2027 | 6% of gross selling price now |
| Round-trip transaction cost | About 4% transfer tax | About 8% to 10% |
Neither market is open in the way a European or Australian buyer expects, and the useful comparison is therefore about the shape of the restriction rather than its presence. Our analysis frames it as a single question: at what point does the building stop being able to sell to someone like you? In Cambodia that point arrives when 70% of the total private-unit area is foreign-held. In the Philippines it arrives at 40% of the project. The methodology matters as much as the number, because the Cambodian cap is measured on area and the Philippine one on the project as a whole, so two buildings with identical unit counts can sit at very different points on the two scales.
- The Cambodian cap is measured on total area, never on the number of units.
- The Philippine cap is a project-level ceiling, not a personal one.
- Cambodian rules are set out in the foreign ownership guide.
- The Thai version of this comparison is Cambodia versus Thailand.
- The Vietnamese version is Cambodia versus Vietnam.
How much can a foreigner own in each country?
Cambodia permits freehold strata title on private units above the ground floor up to 70% of the building’s total private-unit area, under the Law of 24 May 2010 and Sub-Decree No. 126 of 2009. The Philippines permits condominium ownership up to 40% of the project under Republic Act 4726.
| Ownership question | Cambodia | Philippines |
|---|---|---|
| Governing instrument | Law of 24 May 2010, Sub-Decree No. 126 | Republic Act 4726, the Condominium Act |
| Cap basis | 70% of total private-unit area | 40% of the condominium project |
| Ground-floor units | Excluded from foreign ownership | Generally available |
| Land or house on land | Closed to foreigners | Closed to foreigners |
| Long lease alternative | 15 to 50 years, renewable | 25 years, renewable once |
| Effect at the cap | Foreign purchases stop | Foreign-to-foreign transfers freeze |
Insider tip: the difference that costs money is not the headline percentage, it is what happens when a building fills. In the Philippines, once the 40% ceiling is reached, foreign-to-foreign transfers freeze and a departing foreign owner can sell only to a Filipino buyer or to a foreigner taking over a vacated slot. In Cambodia, reaching the 70% area cap stops further foreign purchases in that building but leaves a much larger share of the stock in foreign hands and therefore a much larger pool of eligible onward buyers. Our underwriting treats the remaining quota as an exit variable rather than an entry formality, and the checklist item is the same in both countries: get the current figure in writing from the building administration before any deposit moves.
- Ask for the current foreign quota in writing, in both countries.
- A full Philippine building freezes foreign-to-foreign resale.
- Cambodian quota mechanics sit in the strata title FAQ.
- Lease and structure routes are in the lease, nominee and trust guide.
- Land routes are covered in the land ownership guide.
What does a comparable unit cost in each capital?
Prime Metro Manila condominiums ask roughly PHP 300,000 to PHP 330,000 per square metre, which converts to about $4,850 to $5,340 at 61.85 pesos to the dollar. Prime Phnom Penh strata in BKK1 and Tonle Bassac runs $2,300 to $3,200 per square metre, so the capital is materially cheaper per metre.
| Price measure | Cambodia, Phnom Penh | Philippines, Metro Manila |
|---|---|---|
| Prime price per sqm | $2,300 to $3,200 | About $4,850 to $5,340 |
| City average per sqm | About $1,800 | Above the Phnom Penh average |
| Entry studio ticket | $35,000 to $65,000 | Higher in prime districts |
| Quoted gross yield | 5.22% to 7.4% in Phnom Penh | About 5%, national range 4% to 6% |
| Currency of the price | US dollar | Philippine peso |
| Supply backdrop | 76,000 to 80,000 condo units | Substantially larger market |
Metro Manila is the more expensive capital per square metre and the lower-yielding one, which is the outcome a scale premium usually produces. Our analysis is careful with this comparison rather than triumphant about it, because the Philippine number carries a depth of market that Cambodia cannot match: more transactions, more comparables, more lenders and a functioning REIT sector. A buyer scenario worth naming is the investor who reads a Phnom Penh yield advantage of one or two points and treats it as free money. It is compensation for thinner liquidity, and pricing it as anything else is the most common error in cross-border comparisons of this kind. Put in numbers, the Phnom Penh advantage is worth perhaps 1.5 to 2.4 points of gross yield against a Manila reading near 5%, and it is being paid for by a market with 76,000 to 80,000 condominium units and an absorption rate of only 3% to 4% a year.
- Manila is dearer per metre and lower yielding at the prime end.
- Cambodia’s yield advantage is compensation for thinner liquidity.
- Phnom Penh yield workings sit in the yield guide.
- Ticket sizes are in the condo price guide.
- Net-of-tax modelling is in the net versus gross yield guide.
What does each country take in tax?
The Philippines applies a 25% final withholding tax on a non-resident alien’s gross rental income with no deductions permitted, against Cambodia’s 14% withholding on Cambodian-source income paid to non-residents. Philippine round-trip transaction costs for foreign buyers commonly reach 8% to 10%, against a 4% Cambodian transfer tax on assessed value.
| Tax or cost | Cambodia | Philippines |
|---|---|---|
| Rent, non-resident | 14% withholding | 25% final withholding on gross |
| Deductions against rent | Limited | None for this class |
| Transfer or stamp on purchase | 4% transfer tax | 1.5% documentary stamp tax |
| Local transfer tax | Included in the 4% | 0.5% to 0.75% |
| Capital gains on sale | 20% of the gain from 1 Jan 2027 | 6% of gross selling price |
| Typical round trip | About 4% | About 8% to 10% |
The tax comparison splits cleanly by holding period, and this is where the Philippines takes back ground. A landlord holding for income is far better off in Cambodia, where the rent withholding is eleven points lower. A seller crystallising a large gain after 1 January 2027 is better off in the Philippines, where 6% of gross selling price will usually be a smaller bill than 20% of the gain on an asset that has appreciated meaningfully. Our underwriting therefore refuses to answer the tax question in the abstract and models both jurisdictions over the buyer’s actual intended hold, because the crossover point moves with the size of the expected gain rather than with anything about the two tax codes.
- Income buyers are better served by the Cambodian 14% rate.
- Large-gain sellers after 2027 may prefer the Philippine 6%.
- Cambodian rates are set out in the taxes and fees guide.
- The 2027 change is covered in the capital gains tax guide.
- Home-country treatment sits in the home country tax guide.
What does the currency do to a dollar investor?
Cambodia is dollarised, with about 80% of broad money held in foreign currency, so a dollar investor takes essentially no local currency risk. The Philippine peso set a record low of 61.85 to the dollar in July 2026, roughly 9.3% weaker year on year, with market forecasts near 63 by year end.
| Currency factor | Cambodia | Philippines |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction currency | US dollar | Philippine peso |
| Share of broad money in FX | About 80% | Not applicable |
| Recent move against the dollar | Effectively pegged behaviour | Record low 61.85 in July 2026 |
| Twelve-month change | Negligible for a dollar holder | About 9.3% weaker |
| Forecast direction | Stable | Near 63 by end 2026 |
| Effect on a dollar rent | None | Rent set in a falling currency |
Currency is the quietest line in a comparison like this and often the largest. A Philippine landlord collecting peso rent and measuring returns in dollars lost roughly 9.3% of that income stream over twelve months before a single tenant missed a payment, and forecasts near 63 imply the same pressure continuing. Our analysis has repeatedly found that this single factor swamps the yield gap between the two markets over any multi-year hold, and the red flag is a projection that quotes a Philippine gross yield in percentage terms without stating which currency the numerator and denominator are in. Cambodian dollarisation removes that entire line from the model, which is worth more to most foreign buyers than a point of headline yield.
- Peso rent measured in dollars fell about 9.3% over twelve months.
- Cambodian dollarisation removes the currency line entirely.
- The dollar economy is explained in the dollarisation guide.
- Getting proceeds out is covered in the repatriation guide.
- Banking mechanics sit in the bank account guide.
Which country is easier to retire into?
Cambodia asks less of a retiree than any comparable programme in the region. Its ER retirement extension requires age 55, no employment and no fixed deposit at all, at about $290 to $300 a year. The Philippine SRRV requires a refundable deposit of $15,000 to $50,000 depending on age and pension status.
| Retirement route | Cambodia ER | Philippines SRRV |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum age | 55 | 40 after the September 2025 restructure |
| Deposit required | None | $15,000 to $50,000 |
| Deposit with a pension | Not applicable | $15,000 |
| Deposit without a pension | Not applicable | $30,000 at 50 plus, $50,000 at 40 to 49 |
| Annual cost | About $290 to $300 | $360, after a $1,500 one-off fee |
| Renewal | Repeatable, no stated limit | Renewable |
The Philippine deposit is refundable and remains the retiree’s own money, which is a fair point and one that promotional Cambodian content usually omits. What it is not is liquid: it sits with the Philippine Retirement Authority for as long as the visa runs. Our analysis treats the relevant question as opportunity cost rather than expense, and for a retiree whose capital is already committed to a property purchase, a $30,000 deposit sitting idle is a real constraint. The buyer scenario where the Philippine route wins is the retiree aged 40 to 54, because Cambodia simply does not offer them an ER extension at that age. That age gap is the single clearest advantage the Philippine programme holds, and it widened rather than narrowed when the September 2025 restructure dropped the SRRV minimum from 50 to 40 while raising the no-pension deposit to $50,000 for that younger band.
- Cambodia asks no deposit and no statutory income floor.
- The Philippine deposit is refundable but illiquid while the visa runs.
- Cambodian retirement detail sits in the retirement guide.
- Other Cambodian visa classes are in the visa options guide.
- The property-linked residency route is in the residency guide.
Advantages and disadvantages
Cambodia wins on ownership allowance, rent taxation and currency. The Philippines wins on scale, legal depth and capital gains treatment.
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Cambodian 70% cap against a Philippine 40% cap | Cambodia has a far smaller transaction pool |
| Cambodian 14% rent withholding against 25% | Cambodian 20% capital gains tax from 1 Jan 2027 |
| Cambodian dollarisation removes currency risk | Cambodian lending for foreigners is thin |
| Cambodian round trip near 4% against 8% to 10% | Philippine legal depth is genuinely greater |
| Cambodian ER visa needs no deposit | Philippine SRRV opens at 40, Cambodia at 55 |
| Cambodian prime pricing is roughly half Manila’s | Philippine REIT market has no Cambodian equal |
A fair reading is that the Philippines is the better country and Cambodia the better position for this particular buyer. Scale, language, legal precedent, lender depth and an actual listed property sector all favour Manila, and none of those advantages disappears because a cap is set at 40%. What they do not do is change the arithmetic a specific foreign landlord faces: a lower ownership ceiling, an eleven-point higher rent withholding, and a currency that lost about 9.3% against the dollar in twelve months.
Buyer scenarios and red flags
Three scenarios cover most enquiries where both countries are genuinely on the table.
| Scenario | What they want | What we would recommend |
|---|---|---|
| Income buyer, ten-year hold, dollar base | Predictable net rent | Cambodia, on withholding and currency |
| Trader expecting a large gain by 2030 | Capital growth, clean exit | Model both; Philippine 6% may beat 20% |
| Retiree aged 46 with no pension yet | Residency plus a home | Philippines; Cambodian ER opens at 55 |
The failure pattern is a comparison run on headline yield alone. A buyer sees about 5% in Manila and 5.22% to 7.4% in Phnom Penh, concludes the gap is modest, and stops there. The gap after tax is not modest: 25% of gross against 14% moves a 5% Philippine gross below 3.8% net of withholding, while a 6.5% Phnom Penh gross holds above 5.5% on the same treatment. Add a currency that fell about 9.3% in twelve months on one side and none on the other, and the two markets are not a point apart. Our underwriting runs both models after tax and after currency before it looks at the property at all, and on that order of operations the comparison rarely stays close.
- Compare after withholding tax, not on gross yield.
- State which currency both sides of a yield are denominated in.
- Confirm the remaining foreign quota in writing in either country.
- Model the Philippine 6% against the Cambodian 20% on your actual expected gain.
- Treat a refundable SRRV deposit as committed capital, not as a fee.
Tell us the hold period and the currency you measure returns in. Those two answers usually settle this comparison before we look at a single unit.
Talk to our Cambodia deskFrequently Asked Questions
Cambodia, at 70% of a building's total private-unit area, against a 40% project cap in the Philippines under Republic Act 4726. Neither allows foreign land freehold.
A per-project ceiling on total foreign interest, not a personal limit. Once a building reaches it, a foreign seller can only sell to a Filipino or to a foreigner taking a vacated slot.
The Philippines. A non-resident alien pays 25% final withholding on gross rent with no deductions. Cambodia withholds 14% on Cambodian-source income paid to non-residents.
Philippine round trips commonly run 8% to 10%, including 6% capital gains tax, 1.5% documentary stamp tax and 0.5% to 0.75% transfer tax. Cambodia charges a 4% transfer tax.
A great deal. Cambodia is dollarised with about 80% of broad money in foreign currency. The peso hit a record low of 61.85 in July 2026, about 9.3% weaker year on year.
The Philippines charges 6% of gross selling price today. Cambodia charges nothing until 1 January 2027, then 20% of the gain, which on a large gain is the heavier bill.
Cambodia. The ER extension needs age 55 and no deposit at about $290 to $300 a year, against an SRRV deposit of $15,000 to $50,000 plus $1,500 once and $360 a year.
Get a Cambodia property shortlist
Share your budget, target district (BKK1, Koh Pich, Koh Norea, Siem Reap), and goal. We reply within one business day with matched stock and next steps.